Do not resuscitate (DNR) emergency medical services (EMS) protocol variation in the United States

08/16/25 at 03:15 AM

Do not resuscitate (DNR) emergency medical services (EMS) protocol variation in the United States
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine; by Amelia M Breyre, E Jane Merkle-Scotland, David H Yang, Kenneth Hanson, Sameer Jagani, Abe Tolkoff, Satheesh Gunaga; 7/25
Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders are essential for ensuring that critically ill patients receive care from Emergency Medical Service (EMS) aligned with their preferences. However, significant variations exist in EMS protocols regarding acceptable DNR documentation leading to discordant care, moral distress, and ethical dilemmas. Although most EMS protocols have dedicated DNR protocols, this is not universal and there is significant variability in types of documentation recognized as valid. Documentation that is concise, portable, and designed for EMS use, such as the POLST is preferred. 
Assistant Editor's note: It is this variability in protocols that personally scares many of us who work in the EOL field. It is not uncommon to hear a hospice/palliative worker joke that they want a "DNR tatoo on their chest"! Perhaps it would be easier (and less painful) to continue to promote POLST, or something similar, in each of our respective workplaces.

Back to Literature Review